The Leader’s Roadmap to 2026: A Practical Guide for VCSE Leaders Navigating the New Funder Accountability Landscape

A PRACTICAL GUIDE · 2026 · CO-AUTHORED WITH FLÓRA RAFFAI

By Mo Farhat, Founder · Quematics  |  Flóra Raffai, Founder · Rapport Coaching

Frameworks Covered: Integrated Settlements for Mayoral Combined Authorities 2026–29 · Adult Social Care Priorities for Local Authorities 2026–27 · Every Child Achieving and Thriving — SEND Reform 2026 · NHS Strategic Commissioning Framework April 2026

Why 2026 is Different

Four major frameworks. One moment. A practical roadmap.

This guide bridges the gap between what funders and commissioners now expect and what VCSE leaders need to do about it — practically, confidently, and without adding to an already stretched team.

Why the Landscape is Changing

VCSE leaders have navigated patchwork reporting for years. A different spreadsheet for every funder, a different set of outcomes for every contract. That approach worked because each funding stream operated in its own silo. A fragmented response was sufficient. That is no longer the case.

Four major accountability shifts are converging in 2026, each from a different part of the public sector, and each asking the same question: not what did you do, but what changed because of it?

Mayoral Combined Authorities

The Integrated Settlements for Mayoral Combined Authorities mean Combined Authorities are now formally accountable to the Government for outcomes tracked against specific indicators and trajectories. From 2026–27, this applies to five further regions including Liverpool City Region, West Yorkshire, and Greater London for the first time. If your organisation works on employment support, skills, debt advice, housing, or community resilience — and receives funding through a Combined Authority — you are now operating inside a framework with measurable outcome commitments attached.

Adult Social Care

The DHSC published its Adult Social Care Priorities for Local Authorities: 2026 to 2027 in December 2025, centred on three national priority outcomes. Befriending services, community inclusion projects, peer support networks, and any VCSE organisation commissioned to reduce isolation or support independence will increasingly need to demonstrate their contribution to those priorities — not just report on activity.

SEND Reform

Following the Every Child Achieving and Thriving White Paper published 23 February 2026, Ofsted now has a standalone inclusion judgement already being applied in inspections. Community playgroups, youth clubs, parenting programmes, and early years providers receiving SEND-related funding are expected to evidence their contribution to inclusion outcomes — not simply describe what they offer.

NHS Commissioning

The NHS Strategic Commissioning Framework effective April 2026 makes it explicit: the era of activity counts is ending. For NHS-commissioned services — mental health drop-ins, social prescribing, community health programmes — outcomes, equity, and value for money are now the baseline requirement.

None of these frameworks is unmanageable on its own. What makes 2026 different is that they are all asking for the same thing at the same time. One structured approach to outcome data — collected consistently, held in one place, reportable in multiple formats — answers all four.

01 · The Data Journey and the Human Reality

By Flóra Raffai · Rapport Coaching

These new requirements add a layer of complication to an already complex situation, particularly for smaller organisations. To understand the impact of these changes, we have to look at the actual journey of data collection and the hurdles we face at every step.

The Beneficiary and the Trust Gap

The journey starts with the individual. In the VCSE sector, we often work with the most vulnerable or marginalised people. These individuals often have valid trust issues because they may have been let down by institutions in the past. We are working with a whole person and their experience, but funders often want that experience sliced into dozens of different statistics. It is a constant challenge to collect what we need without making someone feel like they are just being made into a statistic before they can even get the help they want.

The Impact on Front-line Staff

This dynamic creates a difficult pressure for front-line workers. So much of our work in the VCSE sector centres on human connection. When data collection becomes an admin task that requires hand-filling forms or using a device in the field where the internet is missing, it gets in the way of that connection. It can even undermine the quality of the service. If we have to ask a person to repeat their story multiple times because they are accessing different services with different funders, we are adding to their burden and our own.

The Challenge of Analysis and Translation

Once the data is collected, the next hurdle is bringing it all together. Most small and medium-sized organisations do not have the budget for a dedicated data analyst. Instead, the work of analysis falls on leaders who are already stretched thin. We find ourselves cobbling together data from different sources, such as manual trackers or various case management exports.

We then have to translate all of this for different funders who all use their own acronyms they expect you to know. You might be asked to use psychological profile scales when you aren’t a trained psychologist, simply because it is required for health reporting.

The Reporting Uncertainty

Finally, there is the challenge of presenting this data. Often, the person writing the report or presenting it isn’t the front-line worker who actually delivered the service. This creates a feeling of uncertainty. You have to hope the data is accurate and that it truly represents the individual’s journey, even though you know how difficult it was to bring those different pieces of information together.

When we design a better process, we protect the human connection at the heart of our work. This is not just about fulfilling a contract — it is about creating a structure that is kinder and less burdensome on our service users, our front-line staff, and our leaders.

02 · A Practical Four-Stage Approach

By Flóra Raffai · Rapport Coaching

Moving toward a more structured approach does not have to happen all at once. A deliberate path that starts with understanding your current reality before changing it is often more effective.

1. Impact and Data Mapping

Before looking for new tools, understand what is currently happening in your organisation. Map how data actually moves through your charity and what you are currently measuring.

Identify what is working and where the pain points are. Involve everyone who experiences the data journey — including service users. Then review how the data relates to your vision, mission, and theory of change — and whether you are tracking the impact you intend to make, or just what was previously required.

2. Strategy and Process Design

When you have a clear picture of your data mapping, you can look for ways to improve and streamline the entire process. In line with GDPR principles, look at how you can minimise data — only collecting what is actually needed for your organisation and your reporting.

Where you see overlaps in what different funders require, consider approaching them to discuss flexible reporting. Many are open to this when you link it to the national frameworks they are also accountable to.

3. Implementation and Tool Selection

The goal is to move toward a single source of truth where data is held in one place rather than in parallel systems built for individual funders. This requires a deliberate leadership decision to stop tolerating the administrative burden of disconnected systems.

Before a full rollout, run a small trial to see how the approach feels for service users, front-line staff, and those who analyse and report on the data.

4. Training and Rollout

Upskilling and training is about more than just technical instructions. It is about helping the team understand why this data matters for the charity and how it can eventually reduce their own admin burden. Appoint a specific project lead who oversees the entire process and ensures that everyone feels supported as they move to the new system.

“Rollout is a leadership task that involves helping the team see that fixing the underlying systems is what allows them to focus back on the front-line delivery that matters most.”
— Section 2: A Practical Four-Stage Approach

03 · Tool Selection Recommendations

By Mo Farhat · Quematics & Flóra Raffai · Rapport Coaching

Choosing a system can be overwhelming, especially when you are trying to balance limited budgets with high reporting expectations. Strategic confidence does not require a six-figure technology investment. It requires a tool that meets basic principles of security and flexibility.

The Non-Negotiables

These are the elements we believe are essential for a small or medium-sized charity to operate safely and effectively in 2026:

Data security and protection
High-security storage with UK or EU-based servers to comply with UK GDPR and Data Protection Acts.

Cloud-based access
Essential for staff and volunteers working remotely or from different locations to access information in real time.

User access levels
Different levels of access to ensure that sensitive data is only seen by those who need it for their role.

A single data model, not a single database
Focus on what the system does with your data underneath. Ask whether it produces structured, exportable rows and columns — not just PDFs and charts.

Separation of data collection and reporting
Using the same tool to collect and report works until a funder asks for something it cannot produce. Ask yourself: if I needed to answer a question this system was not designed for, what would it take?

The Wishlist

If you have additional resources or specific service needs, these elements can add extra value:

Offline access
Useful for staff working in areas where wi-fi or mobile data is unreliable.

Data collection portals
Allowing service users to complete information themselves or enabling staff to enter data easily while in the field.

Easy export functions
One-click exports to Excel or Word so you can quickly add your own narrative to the numbers.

Secure data analytics
Internal tools that help you ask deeper questions of your data without it leaving your secure environment.

Audit trail
The ability to show when data was entered, by whom, and whether it has been changed. It protects you when data quality is challenged by a commissioner.

04 · Resource Honesty

By Flóra Raffai & Mo Farhat

After looking at the four-stage approach and the technical requirements for 2026, it is natural for a leader to feel a sense of pressure. Knowing when to seek external support is a leadership decision based on an honest assessment of your resources. Across every major public funding stream, data oversight is no longer optional.

There are several prompts that can help you decide if you need to bring in support:

• Do you have someone within the organisation who can lead on the mapping and strategy stages, or do you have the technical knowledge to customise a tool yourselves?
• Do you have the capacity to trial and evaluate a new approach while still delivering your core services? If your leadership team is already stretched too thin to oversee a technical implementation, that is a clear signal to look for a partner.
• Is your team currently in a place where they can handle a change process? If your staff are already experiencing data dread, pushing through a new system without enough support can undermine your service quality.

You can ask for help at any stage — whether that is for the initial strategy, the technical setup, or the training of your volunteers. Recognising the limits of your internal capacity is what allows you to protect your team and ensure your organisation remains contract-ready for the years ahead.

From a data and systems perspective, the honest question is not whether you need external support — it is at which point the risk of not having it becomes greater than the effort of finding it. Most small organisations underestimate the time involved in setting up a data infrastructure that actually works. It is not the software that takes the time. It is the decisions: what to collect, how to define it consistently, how to handle the variation between services. Those are not technical problems. They are organisational ones, and they require someone with capacity and authority to resolve them.

05 · Governing the Shift

By Mo Farhat · Quematics & Flóra Raffai · Rapport Coaching

Whether you choose to manage this transition internally or with external support, the final responsibility for the organisation remains with the board. Trustees carry the legal responsibility for contractual and data obligations, but most charity boards are not made up of commissioning specialists or data professionals.

The board does not need to understand the technical detail of every individual framework. They need to be able to answer three questions with confidence.

01 · Are we collecting the right data?

Is the team capturing who was served, what their need was, what was done, and what actually changed? If this answer is uncertain, it represents a governance risk that should be named at board level regardless of which funder is asking.

02 · Can we produce evidence on request?

If a commissioner or an inspector asked tomorrow for evidence of impact across the last twelve months, how long would it take the team to respond and how confident would they be in the results?

03 · Does someone own this?

Boards must ensure that the person responsible has what they need to do the work. If the answer is “it sits with the CEO alongside everything else,” that is itself a governance finding worth naming.

Providing honest answers to those three questions, even when some reveal gaps, is what good governance looks like.

In practice, good governance of data compliance is not a quarterly technical report read out to a confused board. It is a single, structured update — ideally no more than one page — that answers those three questions directly and flags any change from the previous period. Data compliance in 2026, across multiple funding streams simultaneously, is not a task that can be reliably managed as an afterthought to the leadership role.

06 · Leading with Confidence in 2026

The road to accountability in 2026 is not just about a change in software or the introduction of a new spreadsheet. It is a fundamental shift in how we value our work and how we protect the people we support. By moving away from the patchwork reporting of the past, we are giving our teams the space to focus on the human connection that defines the voluntary sector.

The organisations that will navigate this shift most confidently are not necessarily the largest or best-resourced. They are the ones that have made a deliberate decision to treat their data as a strategic asset — using analytics not just to satisfy a funder’s reporting template, but to understand their own impact, spot patterns in who they are reaching, and make better decisions about where their limited capacity is best deployed.

While the new requirements from the NHS, local authorities, and combined authorities are complex, they also represent an opportunity to prove the immense value of the VCSE sector. When we move toward a single source of truth, we are choosing to be defined by our impact rather than our administrative burden. The frameworks are changing, but your mission remains the same.

Glossary of Terms

ASCOF (Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework)
A set of national measures used by DHSC to assess how well local authorities and their partners are delivering adult social care outcomes, covering quality of life, independence, and the experience of people drawing on care and support.

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
The legal framework that sets the rules for how personal data must be collected, stored, and protected in the UK.

ICB (Integrated Care Board)
Regional NHS bodies responsible for planning and funding health and care services in their local area.

MCA (Mayoral Combined Authority)
Groups of local councils working together across a region, often led by a directly elected Mayor, with devolved powers over areas like employment and skills.

SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities)
A term used in education and social care to describe children and young people who have learning difficulties or disabilities requiring additional support. Currently undergoing significant reform through the Every Child Achieving and Thriving White Paper (2026).

Theory of Change
A methodology used by charities to map out the logical links between their activities and the long-term impact they want to achieve.

VCSE (Voluntary, Community, and Social Enterprise)
The broad range of organisations that deliver services and support across the public and for-impact sector.

About the Authors

Mo Farhat · Founder · Quematics

Mo Farhat is the founder of Quematics, a data infrastructure and advanced analytics practice built for VCSE organisations navigating the growing evidence demands of public sector commissioning. Combining artificial intelligence and advanced data analytics, Mo specialises in turning fragmented, funder-driven reporting into structured, commissioner-ready evidence — while also helping organisations gain clarity on their own internal KPIs and performance. His work focuses on making the prevention, outcome and impact delivered by the VCSE sector visible to the public bodies that fund it: across NHS commissioning, adult social care, Combined Authority settlements, and SEND frameworks. Mo believes that data is only as valuable as the action it inspires — and that the most powerful thing any organisation can do with its data is share it with the right people, in the right way, at the right moment.

www.quematics.com · LinkedIn

Flóra Raffai · Founder · Rapport Coaching

Flóra Raffai is an EMCC accredited coach, trainer, and consultant who specialises in supporting small organisations to make a big difference. As a CEO with over a decade of leadership and trustee experience across health, education, community development, and technology, she understands first-hand the weight of responsibility leaders often carry. Through her practice, Rapport Coaching, she provides one-to-one coaching, interactive training, and collaborative consultancy that help leaders and teams find clarity, confidence, and momentum. Flóra is the author of Chief Everything Officer: A Field Guide for Small Organisation Leaders and currently serves as Co-Chair of Support Cambridgeshire and as a member of the Small Charity Friendly Collective.

www.rapport-coaching.com · LinkedIn · Rapport Coaching Company Page

Free to share · For VCSE leaders · Quematics × Rapport Coaching